After the past 3 years of criminal malfeasance on the President’s part, malfeasance that has spread throughout “his” administration, it is time for all Americans to admit to the gross damage that inserting Biden as president has caused. Democrats have nothing to be proud of – and much to answer for – in the matters of the 2020 elections. The possibility that Biden was fairly elected dwindles almost daily. A fair observer should concede that Trump’s suspicion of unprecedented election fraud and wrong-doing is well justified. His frantic attempts to reverse the certifications of “votes” were justified actions of a chief executive officer. Unfortunately, there is neither time nor mechanism to expose distortions as grand and effective as those employed in 2020. January Sixth played out as the phenomenal political hatchet that certain rabid leftists and anti-Trumpers had only dreamed-of hitherto.
As a result of the various crimes and distortions of 2020, Joe Biden and a gaggle of idiots came into power, including for the third time, Barack Obama. Biden, it is clear, has neither the thoughtfulness nor mental capacity to contrive the policies his administration is following. He has never understood history. Neither has he ever judged the nature of foreign leaders properly, accounting for decades of poor decision-making through his Senate and Vice-Presidential tenures. Worse, he is personally weak, leaving him easily manipulated by stronger personalities like the aforementioned Mr. Obama. His declining mental sharpness places the United States’ existence as a world power at existential risk. Woe are we.
It is hard to isolate a single Biden failure to discuss, but it seems Prudent to consider the open borders policies he has fostered. One must ask oneself, “Why in God’s name would anyone with influence in the U. S. promote or favor or allow such policies?” There are two reasons that have been stated over and over in multiple ways, neither good for the USA: 1) Change the demographic majority of our population (white’s need not apply); and 2) Divide the U. S. against itself and weaken it economically. Accomplishing the first will install Democrats forever in power – priority 1 – and accomplishing the second will enable globalism to replace Independence. For shame. We can see a dozen other leftist, anti-American policies working toward the same goals in education, communications, medicine and constant erosion of religious thought, but none will achieve the two main goals as rapidly as Biden’s flood of 10 MILLION or more illegal entrants.
The premises under which Biden acted to carry out Obama’s long-time plan, derive from “Executive Orders,” and were illegal in and of themselves. An executive order by a president can, legally and constitutionally, impact only the executive branch in terms of how the LAWS, passed legislatively and signed into law by a president, shall be executed. An executive order may not prevent the faithful execution of the laws, or set them aside in favor of un-legislated directives put forth by a president on his or her own initiative. However, as Mr Obama is confident of, there are few remedies available in the case of a president’s abuse of power. The only one is “impeachment” in the House followed by conviction by two-thirds of the Senate – a never-accomplished set of actions. No Congress has yet had the political will to carry through an impeachment (allegation) to actual conviction, even when laws have been broken by a president. Hence, “Biden’s” open border policies have remained in place for more than 3 years despite the breaking of and failure of enforcement of, immigration laws.
Millions of words have been spoken and written about the unfolding tragedy and dangers of the failure to enforce our border and immigration laws… except two: “I’m sorry” (for damaging the Nation, the States and hundreds of communities), spoken by Joe Biden. Oddly, no State, even Texas, has yet sued the federal government for imposing costs on States and municipalities in the furtherance of illegal federal actions. Another suit could be filed in federal court concerning those same States and municipalities being forced to not enforce their own laws on behalf of their own citizens. Nor has Biden, himself, been impeached in the House. An illegal travesty continues unabated.
At some point, when the Chinese Communist Party dictates, there will be an horrendous terrorism event inside the United States, perpetrated by some of the thousands of Chinese who have walked into the U. S. and by some of the thousands of entrants from terrorism-sponsoring Muslim countries. Everyone will be upset and casting blame, perhaps even at Joe Biden, who will be long gone or oblivious when it occurs. When it does those Democrats who engineered the certification of Biden’s electoral vote count on January 6th, 2021, will finally offer two words about the open borders policy: “Who, ME?”
The Democrats’ war on Donald Trump is revealing the nature of the Left. It is not very different from how the Bolsheviks and the Soviet Union treated wrong-thinkers as the “Revolution” devolved into brutality and murder. So far, at least, the Biden administration has held off from extorting confessions from those who don’t agree with Administration thinking about virtually anything. No one has mentioned bullets in the back of the head to solve wrong-thinking problems, but locking up political opponents is doing the job.
Sadly, a lot of stupid violence took place on January 6th, 2021. Organized protesters went to Washington with shared, poorly conceived ideas about actually taking over the Capitol, a few of whom were armed and foolishly violent. We still don’t know how involved federal agents were in those groups, but there were many, evidently. And the FBI and others have shown their willingness to embed themselves into conspiratorial groups in order to learn about planning for future crimes. We’ve even seen how the FBI will practically create such a group in the case of the kidnapping of Governor Gretchen Whitmer of Michigan. There are many questionable actors who were in the crowd on January 6th, but no one has identified or questioned them.
On the other hand, many of those currently incarcerated due to January 6th events, assaulted no one, smashed nothing and did no worse than enter the Capitol through open doors. Their treatment in jail seems to be outside of legal norms; some have yet to be charged two and a half years after the fact. Those are they who can be considered “political” prisoners. Having watched FBI agents storm the private homes of pro-life activists while permitting illegal demonstrations at the homes of Supreme court Justices, shows that the motivations within the FBI are political in many instances and worth questioning. Could there have been a cadre of FBI and other agents embedded in groups that went to the Capitol intending violence? Apparently, yes.
There are other oddities about the so-called “insurrection.” One is that President Trump wanted to reinforce the Capitol Police with thousands of National Guard troops. Legally, only the mayor of Washington and / or the Speaker of the House could “ask” for federal troops to function in their jurisdictions. Both refused to do so.
Information and “intelligence” existed that indicated subversive groups were planning to create troubles on January 6th. Trump was holding a huge rally near the White House and thousands of people would be in the city and probably attempting to approach the Capitol to protest the certification of electoral votes. If there were a way to turn such a protest to Democratic advantage, no pair of Democrat leaders would be better positioned – or likely – to take such advantage than Pelosi and Bowser. Having the crowds storm the Capitol, particularly in conjunction with rabble-rousers whom both knew were intending to do so, could create the perfect storm of confusion and illegality with which to smear Donald Trump and conservatives in general. It was all too well played out for the benefit of Democrats.
Within hours, Speaker Pelosi ordered fencing with razor wire and guarded gateways to surround the Capitol complex. Added to that “security” were thousands of National Guard troops that she treated fairly poorly, causing them to sleep in parking garages among other things. Soon the “January Sixth” committee was formed outside of Congressional traditions and yet another impeachment of Trump was attempted to no avail. But, the January 6th Committee continued its tightly slanted “investigation” for a year and a half, yielding mostly political claims and talking points, while copious real evidence was hidden or kept secret. Little of value derived from the committee’s “work” although lots of fearsome claims were made about conservatives and Trump supporters. Now we’ve learned that the “Committee” destroyed much of its recorded work – a travesty, if not multiple crimes. Another set of tactics were developed and implemented through the Department Of Justice.
Soon, three state and two separate federal charges were concocted and fed to grand juries in New York State and City, Georgia, Florida and Washington, DC. – fed by prosecutors, a District Attorney and Attorneys General who are known to hate Donald Trump or to have backed Democrat politicians financially. Naturally, they would set aside all biases in the matters of accusations against former President, Donald Trump, who believes that the 2020 elections were rigged against him fraudulently and that his likely victory in 2020 was “stolen” from him and the 75 Million voters who voted for him. (Wink, now.)
Trump, however, is in legal jeopardy, starting with the New York City charges brought by District Attorney, Alvin Bragg. In order that he could “gin up” charges against Trump, a “count” against him was created for every check paid to reimburse Trump’s then-attorney, Cohen, who had created a means of payment to adult dancer, Stormy Daniels, of some $150,000. At one point she claimed the money was to keep her from talking about a sexual encounter with Trump while he was married. In other statements, she denied such an encounter. Trump’s counter-argument is that Ms. Daniels had tried to extort money from Trump and that he paid her “hush” money to prevent public embarrassment. This would naturally and automatically help him as he began his campaign to become president in 2016. So, depending on how you look at it, paying her to keep quiet made sense on several levels, not simply political.
But Bragg is certain that the misdemeanor “crimes” of incorrect bookkeeping entries by the Trump organization were done to cover up a larger, Federal crime, of illegal campaign contributions. That case can be made, but has virtually never been made before. “Getting” The Donald trumps every other consideration.
Letitia James, the New York State Attorney General, ran for her office on a promise to “get Trump.” She’s doing everything she can. She’s cobbled together a host of charges against Trump’s companies, going back several years, claiming that properties and assets were “overvalued” to obtain loan rates and amounts that were, therefore, obtained fraudulently. That those institutions that loaned money to Trump entities all made money and profits from dealing with Trump, makes no difference if there’s a way to damage Trump, himself. That poorer individuals wouldn’t have been able to obtain the same terms is simply stating the nature of finance. If it involves Trump, however, there must be a racist, homophobic, insurrectionist crime that’s prosecutable. “Show me the man and I’ll show you the crime.” Lavrenti Beria would be right at home in the Attorney General’s office.
Jack Smith, prosecutor of the “Documents Case,” is a different matter, and so is his case. Trump had retained documents upon leaving the white House that were, evidently, still classified. Some of his own statements seem to confirm that he knew some of them were problematic and still classified. There are more than 32 felony counts filed against him and some may stick. Trump has done his best to call Smith, himself, into question, but he is still the person who could get him convicted. Many of the circumstances surrounding the case are unprecedented, and done for political reasons, but the facts on the ground are what they are. The whole premise could have been – and heretofore, always have been – resolved through negotiation. Virtually every President has retained records from office; Trump is the first to be charged criminally for doing so. So, this case is eminently unfair, but it’s legal and the former President faces legal jeopardy as a result.
Georgia District Attorney for Fulton County, Fani Willis, in fairly obvious collusion with the federal DOJ, is attempting to strip away attorney-client privilege and executive privilege, while criminalizing opinions about a clearly questionable 2020 election process. This is very bad legal country. Will it lead to any state District Attorney now being able to hobble a President with conspiracy charges for speaking with advisors and attorneys? What a mess Democrats are strewing across our judicial system.
What is it that makes Trump such an object of hatred and political fear? Clearly, he threatens a lot of people in government and in the “industries” that survive on the largesse of government. There are nearly 3 MILLION fairly permanent employees of the federal government. Each has his or her own biases, beliefs and political leanings. Most, unintentionally, some, intentionally, are part of the problem America faces: The rights and desires of the majority of Americans can barely be acknowledged, let alone become public policy, regardless of federal elections. There exists a general resistance to significant change within the administrative morass called “the government.” Trump intended and intends to restore power to the electorate; by default, this requires removing it from the bureaucracy. The levers of power within the bureaucracy – what is called “The Deep State” – include numerous police and investigative agencies, most of which are populated by people who have their own, largely globalist, not nationalist, attitudes toward America. If they deem it necessary, they will do what is being done to Donald Trump to protect their power, not ours. Trump is the symbol, patriotic Americans are the target.
Life can be much more uncomfortable for any group or faction, than its members, literally, never planned for, should the motivating ideologies that have activated the group politically, emotionally or intellectually be exposed as, essentially, incorrect. It is very upsetting, and more so if you are in the subset of that faction that is the last to realize that your beliefs really can’t apply to reality any longer. Those so impacted are quite likely to strike out against those who knew of the wrongness of the formers’ beliefs well in advance of the “new” awareness of those upset. In effect, a larger and larger majority of society appear to be becoming enemies of the newly “awakened” – a most unsettling environment.
This shift in “truths” can affect the powerful as well as the marginal. For those with political power, the reaction seems never to be an adjustment in action or belief, no admissions of error. Rather, the reaction is likely to be what is called “doubling down” on the old beliefs and supporting actions. To a degree, we can see this reaction in Congress, most particularly within and around the so-called “January Sixth Committee,” which has as its main purpose the proving of “White Supremacy” and “domestic terrorism” as the prime motivators of anyone who ever supported Donald Trump. As expected, evidence of the opposite being true is routinely ignored or denigrated as simply part of the “big lie” that the ever-smaller sub-group is sacrificing so mightily to expose. This concentrated cabal remains certain that all Americans will embrace their sacrifice once that premise is “proven.”
For many, the foolishness embodied in the January Sixth committee barely registers as a problem worthy of Congress’ attention, which helps to show the falseness of the premise noted above. The shrinking inner group of alternate believers seems to be more determined than ever to prove their case. Should that fail, hatred of the alternate believers will be the irreducible collapse of their dimming star: there will be no supernova.
So it is with abortion and “choice,” but on a much longer timeline and background of seeming success. This awakening will be one of the most wrenching that America has faced, certainly since the 2nd Civil War. That one, over slavery, finally, made America stronger. The collapse of Abortion, Incorporated, has the potential of doing the same, but only if churches wake up at the same time. America “works” only in a society of shared morality. Will a new understanding of life, itself, open people’s hearts? Not very quickly, Prudence fears.
Abortion “rights” distill the human conflict between spirituality and the worship of socialist government. This conflict has existed since the “Garden of Eden” when the “serpent” convinced “Eve” that surely she would not (actually) die if she ate of the tree of knowledge of good and evil, but that she would become like the gods in knowing of good and evil. When God learned that Adam and Eve had eaten of the tree His love for them tempered his punishment: not death, but difficulty, and banishment from “the Garden.” The “thesis” was that Eve and Adam would die if a certain commandment were not observed; the “serpent” provided the “anti-thesis” that surely they would not die. God’s love for His “children” softened the punishment, as love does and should do, which was explained as the antithesis being slightly more true than the thesis. This is the same dialectic employed by Marx and Hegel and Engels.
For thousands of years, amidst phenomenal progress, prosperity and elevated standards of living, the lure of authoritarianism, Nazism, Soviet Communism and Fascism has clung to the human condition like a voracious parasite. Its only opponent is God and, as Christians believe, his son, the Christ. The story of Jesus Christ, whether one is a believer or not, is a dramatic departure from identity only as part of a religious group. Grouping is virtually automatic, but being FREE because of a personal connection to God, rewards faithful individuals with personal responsibility for individual decisions, choices and actions. There is no freedom without that responsibility; there is no freedom when “right” action is taken only in fear of some earthly authority.
Back to the future of our once-great nation.
Is there a source within society that can rebuild a common morality? Our collective conscience? We need two key elements… no, THREE: 1) Non-political churches; 2) Morally guided education; and, 3) Equal application of laws. Free individuals have the power to empower all three factors. Yet, our imperfect politics is what we tend to look to for salvation from problems created by, mostly, politicians. Do we have some reason to believe that, facing a wide replacement of those in Congressional power, that the new crop of “representatives” in either House is going to help us chart a more morally straight national course? There is almost no historical support for that outcome.
But there is opportunity for America, and it’s wrapped up in our ability to deal with the promised agitation from pro-abortionists. There is no greater moral imperative than to protect our children. There is no economic value that comes close to that of protecting our children. Supposedly economically or politically powerful people can issue drivel that tries to connect the destruction of the unborn with some sort of economic benefit. Obviously the economy exists because there are people, but it is a stretch beyond all reason that aborting new lives is good for everyone, let alone any one. Still, there is a good possibility that overreaction to the end of Roe v. Wade will awaken many who are rabidly in favor of abortion, now. It certainly will focus attention on the worst forms of butchery and profiteering. Prudence would indicate that there is still sufficient moral outrage in Americans’ hearts to overcome the allure of political/financial power. To those in Democrat power, abortion has been played for added power for 50 years – the destruction of 62 Million lives has been a small price to pay to keep re-electing Democrats. What a foul bargain.
The illegal “leak” of Justice Alito’s draft opinion on “Roe,” has unleashed a rash of law-breaking by proponents of unfettered abortion. Within that is the possibility of exposing the utter lawlessness of our own Department of Justice under AG, Merrick Garland. Not only has he lied to Congress in sworn testimony, but he has employed the FBI to investigate parents who are upset about improper educational curricula and ideological indoctrination of their children. The FBI was instructed by Garland to open cases under “domestic terrorism” titles regarding parents who broke no laws.
Now, as proto-criminals harass Supreme Court Justices in direct violation of federal law, America’s AG ignores them and refuses to direct the FBI to apprehend and charge those breaking 18 U. S. Code Section 1512. Unfortunately, with Garland’s apparent political agreement with demonstrators who are in contravention of that section of federal law, and with his established willingness to break federal laws, himself, and to lie about it, no apprehensions or prosecutions appear likely. Perhaps stopping illegal demonstrations is a threat to Democratcy. (spelling intended)
As Prudence has noted before, contracts, including covenants with a free people, are only as good as the integrity of the parties to them. Changing the meaning of words is a common and corrupt means of sidestepping truths, a major cornerstone of integrity. The second paragraph of the Declaration of Independence says, in English, that our unalienable rights include Life, Liberty and the Pursuit of Happiness. The abortion travesty of 1973’s Roe versus Wade decision tried to codify the redefinition of “Life.” There no longer was a question of life or death of a fetus, provided that the pro-death faction was allowed to define when life began to exist. The court did not rule on that, although it tried to “split the baby,” so to speak, by stating that States could limit abortion to the first one or two trimesters of, well, LIFE, perhaps, for lack of a better name. But, in the Blackmun opinion, abortion was allowed throughout pregnancy.
The floodgates were thus opened to dozens of interpretations of “when life begins,” largely coming down to “when the pregnant woman decides it does,” largely on the basis of convenience, not on the life or health of the mother or of the baby. Needless to say, this open-ended death warrant included, and has been argued to include, “abortion” up to the moment of birth. In effect, a woman who decides at the very day of birth that she does not “want” the baby, for it certainly is such, can deny its right to live beyond a point of starvation or dehydration after birth. It seems Prudent that a live baby is a citizen of the United States and causing it to die is murder, no matter the reason or logic for the act. The pro-death faction has been allowed, in some jurisdictions, to redefine the meaning of “murder,” too.
Perhaps there will arrive a national awakening to the horrors of abortion, the cruelty, the pain, the denigration of humanity and even the anti-God aspects thereof. Perhaps morality will win out. Perhaps this 5th Civil War will begin the process of restoring America and erasing our ability to believe one of the worst aspects of socialism: that a fetus can be both a person and not a person at the same time.
Socialism depends on large numbers of people acting as though two diametrically opposed ideas are true. Such mental incongruities are all around us, today. That so many young people can believe, in the midst of unparalleled freedoms, that socialist central governance will make them more free, is one such incongruity. Believing that men and women can change their genders with enough determined willpower, is another. People will fight to hold these opposing ideas simultaneously. In order to do so, of course, requires constant reinforcement by immersion among groups who are also determined to believe two incongruous ideas. They have to redefine a lot of words to support their beliefs.
They ought to be made to answer some obvious questions as, for example, when the somewhat confused mayor of New York City, Eric Adams, was asked if there should be any limits on abortion, and his answer was “No, no limits. It is a woman’s right.” Any reporter with enough courage to ask a public figure a question without prior clearance, should have then asked, “Are there any limits on what procedures may be used to stop the heart of a baby who survives the abortion process?”
As an alternative, should no one with that much courage be within earshot, would be, “Mr. Mayor… if the baby survives the abortion, is it a citizen of the United States?” Surely there would be an answer to one of those queries. At least one of the “abortion activists” shouting slogans in recent days opined that a mother could decide up to the age of two years, or even later, whether the living, growing fetus actually had a right to live and grow any longer. When pressed, it all came down, FOR HER, to “… it’s the mother’s right.” That outlook seems imprudent, at least, and blatantly murderous. How did a female of the species arrive at such a belief?
Prudence indicates that truth will overcome evil, whether EVIL agrees with it or not. The subgroup that likes rubbing shoulders with evil or Satanism, itself, will be come smaller as those farther out from the pit are able to be revulsed by what they’ve been instructed to ignore. At the same time, those who never bought the pro-death lies will gain the courage to resist, if not fight, the proponents of eliminating children. In fact, here are a couple of protester signs that might help: Babies are a pain in the vagina: Get rid of them! Or, if that point is misunderstood, All unwanted children should be killed! Convenience über alles, God forbid.
