One can understand why liberals and other proto-socialists feared George W. Bush. He had developed himself into a patriotic, empathetic and religious man, shucking the follies of his youth and the excesses of inherited power… for the most part. Growing up in the shadow of powerful and successful (read: wealthy) people, going back several generations, creates a different mindset and outward view from those of most of us. The Bush dynasty developed from good fortune and good genes, and, perhaps, some good luck, but no family with the political impact of the Bushes could have had its hand on the levers of wealth and power for so long without ruthless application of power and influence.
But “W” is/was a little different, more empathetic, stemming from his “kinder, gentler” father, George H. W. Bush, and from his newfound humility. Unfortunately, after the 9-11 attacks, “W” also wanted to change the world, exporting and delivering democratic republicanism to other peoples who were not, in themselves, prepared to believe in it. Still, more than most who ascend to the presidency, “W” remained fairly honest, believing in what he was doing, however wrong-headed. Not a bad guy, all things considered, but not a particularly successful leader of the free world, let alone of the United States. The hatred of him was just as wrong-headed, but some of the fears were rational.
The left was more than ready for a change and with some ruthless interventions, able to ride a wave of window dressing and socialism into the White House with Barack Obama. Republicans in general didn’t trust him or ANY of his ideas, while those in congress tended to give him what he wanted for appointments and budgets, despite uniform hostility to the mis-named Affordable Care Act. They couldn’t even make hay from his wild failures internationally and the mis-feasance / malfeasance of his Secretary of State… not even from his demilitarization of the armed forces, socially and financially. He completed two terms, by the end of which he had virtually decimated the Democrat Party.
Still, Obama accomplished much of what he promised to do, starting with the destruction of compromise with Republicans. “We won,” he would say. Policy discussions with Republicans were few and fruitless, if not more derogation than debate. The liberal press learned that access came from right-thinking (left-thinking), not honesty and, indeed, many government types were finding jobs with networks and relatives of powerful network types were finding jobs in the administration – altogether too cozy a relationship and bearing no relationship to the term: Free Press. From 8 years of besmirching “W” Bush at every turn, the left-leaning, Obama-approving press learned that fawning coverage of Obama was a ticket to better ratings.
For the average listener/reader/watcher, the Obama administration was the opportunity to espouse socialism and so-called “multi-culturalism.” Suddenly, finally, it became okay to proclaim alternatives to and opposition towards… umm, actually, more like hatred towards the institutions and standards of “American” culture. Everything that was influenced by the Bible, Christianity and English common law, was fair game for leftist, communists, socialists, atheists and anti-U.S. activists of every stripe, many of whom had been lurking in public education for years. College campuses are full of their weak-kneed and malleable products, now.
Oddly, crony capitalism expanded under Obama, that erstwhile social warrior, as have monopolies, due in large part to the digitization of information and the intellectual laziness of large swaths of the population, particularly educators. Given free rein to proselytize leftward, weaker teachers at all levels literally graded on right-thinking (left-thinking) rather than on true intellectual curiosity, balanced inquiry, research and expansion of knowledge. Indebted graduates and drop-outs emerge committed to ideas untested and unchallenged. Some professors, reduced to tears and seclusion after Hillary’s electoral loss, have never recovered, except to hate the current president and to entertain ways to undo some parts of the Constitution so that such defeat may never recur.
The “politics of personal destruction” first named during the early Clinton era, has become just “politics.” Since The Loss, the only path to power appears to be one that climbs over destruction of opponents, at least for Democrats, and not one paved with better ideas, policies and uplift. As with all socialist movements, uninvolved people are also destroyed, at least in spirit, in order to create a more perfect world, free of merit and everything else that works for the majority of people. Inevitably, the controlling elite minority (also very wealthy) will self-identify and new rules will prevent anyone else from gaining “unfair” advantage in society. Those who “cling” to quaint ideas of individual sovereignty, self-protection, private property, unlicensed enterprise and the Electoral College, will be clearly spotlighted as the reason for others’ failure to achieve, and further restricted to make things even more fair. A final solution for their uppity independence will pass both houses.
Now, too, politics includes the Orwellian “Antifa” gangs. Somehow, and for obscure political reasons never explained, various municipal governments tolerate lawlessness as if it were actually “anti-fascist” in its purposes. Who wants “fascism” in their warmly welcoming and inclusive cities? The thing of it is that “antifa” employs the tactics of classical fascism! Huh. The terrible “fascists” whose heads they try to crack consist of people who believe, basically, in the U. S. Constitution, and there is the crux of modern politics: Constitutionalism and the enumerated and implied rights guaranteed thereunder, is being vilified as “fascism,” an extraordinary twist of language and logic. Our “free press” supports this dichotomous hatred of the country whose Constitution protects them.
The other “new” element of politics in 2019 is a mix-up of anti-legality and anti-Americanism, if not anti-Americans. The hot words are “illegal alien” or, more accurately: “illegal entrant.” One party has invested political capital, much heat, anger and historic blindness on behalf of open borders, unrestricted illegal entry and loose, extra-legal asylum/refugee processes. The net effect of it all is to flood the nation with aliens who are neither committed to earn citizenship or even to learn English, rather to steal from Americans – through government agencies who willingly participate in lawlessness – in order to “share the American Dream” or other phrases of equally opposite meaning. That there is a political party gaining support on this basis ought to trouble all of us.
It seems within the realm of Prudence to doubt the true motives of the Democrat party and its best-known leaders. This is no testament to the righteousness of Republicans, but the rapid leftward skid of Democrats is unparalleled in American history. Since Roe v. Wade the defense of abortion has become more than a mere knife in the heart of Life, itself, morphing into a virtual sacrament that Democrats must receive to stay in the party. Death to unborn children, unborn Americans. It has served its second purpose well, the delegitimizing of religion, most specifically Christianity: the death of America, itself. In leftist hands abortion has been the sharp wedge for breaking the bonds of our federation of states and to break the bonds of freedom, as well.
Some 61 Million Americans have been denied the Right to Life, mainly for convenience. Some millions of them would have grown up to love this nation and its exceptional purposes. They’d have grown and loved and learned and married and taught their children to take care of themselves and their families and their country. Perhaps that is the threat those babies represented – a threat so grievous that they had to be eliminated before they threatened the final solution for our aberrant Constitutionally limited democratic republic, Land of the Free.
Simple abortion has itself morphed into infanticide while illegal entrants are encouraged to sneak in to the country in order to have their babies become U. S. citizens as if by magic. There is magic afoot in abortion on demand: black magic that makes murder the day before birth a right; and for babies who insist on living through abortion procedures, quiet termination in HOSPITALS at the hands of doctors and proto-parents who simply don’t want to take the baby home. Are these children not U. S. citizens by virtue of birthright? How is it that these citizens have not been murdered by willful neglect? Magic most foul, and the hallmark of Democrats – the Party of Death.
